Publication date: Aug 31, 2023
Lockdown was used worldwide to mitigate the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and was the cornerstone non-pharmaceutical intervention of zero-COVID strategies. Many previous impact evaluations of lockdowns are unreliable because lockdowns co-occurred with severe coronavirus disease related health and financial insecurities. This was not the case in Melbourne’s 111-day lockdown, which left other Australian jurisdictions unaffected. Interrogating nationally representative longitudinal survey data and quasi-experimental variation, and controlling for multiple hypothesis testing, we found that lockdown had some statistically significant, albeit small, impacts on several domains of human life. Women had lower mental health (-0. 10 s. d., P = 0. 043, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0. 21 to -0) and working hours (-0. 13 s. d., P = 0. 006, 95% CI = -0. 22 to -0. 04) but exercised more often (0. 28 s. d., P
Concepts | Keywords |
---|---|
10s | Acute |
Australian | Ci= |
Coronavirus | Coronavirus |
Covid | Day |
Lockdowns | Experiment |
Hard | |
Lockdown | |
Lockdowns | |
Melbourne | |
Mitigate | |
Population | |
Quantifying | |
Severe | |
Spread |
Semantics
Type | Source | Name |
---|---|---|
disease | VO | population |
disease | VO | Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 |
disease | IDO | intervention |
pathway | KEGG | Coronavirus disease |