Recapitulating COVID-19 detection methods: RT-PCR, sniffer dogs and electronic nose.

Recapitulating COVID-19 detection methods: RT-PCR, sniffer dogs and electronic nose.

Publication date: Jul 11, 2024

In December 2019, a number of subjects presenting with an unexplained pneumonia-like illness were suspected to have a link to a seafood market in Wuhan, China. Subsequently, this illness was identified as the 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by the World Committee on Virus Classification. Since its initial identification, the virus has rapidly sperad across the globe, posing an extraordinary challenge for the medical community. Currently, the Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is considered the most reliable method for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2. This procedure involves collecting oro-pharyngeal or nasopharyngeal swabs from individuals. Nevertheless, for the early detection of low viral loads, a more sensitive technique, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), has been suggested. Despite the high effectiveness of RT-PCR, there is increasing interest in utilizing highly trained dogs and electronic noses (eNoses) as alternative methods for screening asymptomatic individuals for SARS-CoV-2. These dogs and eNoses have demonstrated high sensitivity and can detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs), enabling them to distinguish between COVID-19 positive and negative individuals. This manuscript recapitulates the potential, advantages, and limitations of employing trained dogs and eNoses for the screening and control of SARS-CoV-2.

Concepts Keywords
Pcr Biological fluid analysis
Pneumonia Dog smell
Seafood Odour fingerprint
Viral SARS-CoV-2
Volatile organic compounds

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19
disease VO nose
disease MESH pneumonia
disease VO Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
disease VO effectiveness

Original Article

(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)