Physician and Practice Characteristics Influencing Telemedicine Uptake Among Frontline Clinicians in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic Response: National Survey Study.

Physician and Practice Characteristics Influencing Telemedicine Uptake Among Frontline Clinicians in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic Response: National Survey Study.

Publication date: Jul 17, 2024

Telemedicine expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, as key policy changes, financial support, and pandemic fears tipped the balance toward internet-based care. Despite this increased support and benefits to patients and clinicians, telemedicine uptake was variable across clinicians and practices. Little is known regarding physician and institutional characteristics underlying this variability. This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing telemedicine uptake among frontline physicians in the early pandemic response. We surveyed a national stratified sample of frontline clinicians drawn from the American Medical Association Physician Professional Data in June or July 2020. The survey inquired about the first month and most recent month (June 2020) of pandemic telemedicine use; sample data included clinician gender, specialty, census region, and years in practice. Local pandemic conditions were estimated from county-level data on COVID-19 rates at the time of survey response. Data were analyzed in a weighted logistic regression, controlling for county-specific pandemic data, and weighted to account for survey data stratification and nonresponse. Over the first 3-4 months of the pandemic, the proportion of physicians reporting use of telemedicine in >30% of visits increased from 29. 2% (70/239) to 35. 7% (85/238). Relative to primary care, odds of substantial telemedicine use (>30%) both during the first month of the pandemic and in June 2020 were increased among infectious disease and critical care physicians and decreased among hospitalists and emergency medicine physicians. At least minimal prepandemic telemedicine use (odds ratio [OR] 11. 41, 95% CI 1. 34-97. 04) and a high 2-week moving average of local COVID-19 cases (OR 10. 16, 95% CI 2. 07-49. 97) were also associated with substantial telemedicine use in June 2020. There were no significant differences according to clinician gender, census region, or years in practice. Prepandemic telemedicine use, high local COVID-19 case counts, and clinician specialty were associated with higher levels of substantial telemedicine use during the early pandemic response. These results suggest that telemedicine uptake in the face of the pandemic may have been heavily influenced by the level of perceived threat and the resources available for implementation. Such understanding has important implications for reducing burnout and preparation for future public health emergencies.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Hospitalists clinician
Internet COVID-19 pandemic
June frontline clinicians
Rapidly frontliners
health outcome
influence
pandemic
physician
pre-pandemic
survey
telehealth
telemedicine
telemonitoring
virtual care

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19 Pandemic
drug DRUGBANK Isoxaflutole
disease VO time
disease MESH infectious disease
pathway REACTOME Infectious disease
disease MESH emergency
disease MESH burnout
drug DRUGBANK Methylphenidate
disease VO effectiveness
disease VO population
disease MESH infections
disease IDO infection
drug DRUGBANK Methionine
drug DRUGBANK Etoperidone
drug DRUGBANK Spinosad
disease IDO process
disease MESH chronic conditions
drug DRUGBANK Gold
disease VO report
disease MESH suicidal ideation
disease IDO quality
drug DRUGBANK Coenzyme M

Original Article

(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)