Changes in memory and cognition during the SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study.

Changes in memory and cognition during the SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study.

Publication date: Oct 01, 2024

Patient-reported outcomes and cross-sectional evidence show an association between COVID-19 and persistent cognitive problems. The causal basis, longevity and domain specificity of this association is unclear due to population variability in baseline cognitive abilities, vulnerabilities, virus variants, vaccination status and treatment. Thirty-four young, healthy, seronegative volunteers were inoculated with Wildtype SARS-CoV-2 under prospectively controlled conditions. Volunteers completed daily physiological measurements and computerised cognitive tasks during quarantine and follow-up at 30, 90, 180, 270, and 360 days. Linear modelling examined differences between ‘infected’ and ‘inoculated but uninfected’ individuals. The main cognitive endpoint was the baseline corrected global cognitive composite score across the battery of tasks administered to the volunteers. Exploratory cognitive endpoints included baseline corrected scores from individual tasks. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials. gov with the identifier NCT04865237 and took place between March 2021 and July 2022. Eighteen volunteers developed infection by qPCR criteria of sustained viral load, one without symptoms and the remainder with mild illness. Infected volunteers showed statistically lower baseline-corrected global composite cognitive scores than uninfected volunteers, both acutely and during follow up (mean difference over all time points = -0. 8631, 95% CI = -1. 3613, -0. 3766) with significant main effect of group in repeated measures ANOVA (F (1,34) = 7. 58, p = 0. 009). Sensitivity analysis replicated this cross-group difference after controlling for community upper respiratory tract infection, task-learning, remdesivir treatment, baseline reference and model structure. Memory and executive function tasks showed the largest between-group differences. No volunteers reported persistent subjective cognitive symptoms. These results support larger cross sectional findings indicating that mild Wildtype SARS-CoV-2 infection can be followed by small changes in cognition and memory that persist for at least a year. The mechanistic basis and clinical implications of these small changes remain unclear. This study was funded through the UK Vaccine Taskforce of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) of Her Majesty’s Government. WT was funded by the EPSRC through the CDT for Neurotechnology Imperial College London.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Clinicaltrials Baseline corrected
July2022 Cognition
March COVID-19
Vaccination Human challenge study
Viral SARS-CoV-2

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19
disease MESH infection
disease MESH viral load
disease MESH upper respiratory tract infection
pathway REACTOME SARS-CoV-2 Infection
disease MESH Infectious Disease
pathway REACTOME Infectious disease
drug DRUGBANK Potassium Chloride
drug DRUGBANK Coenzyme M
disease MESH brain fog
drug DRUGBANK Methylergometrine
disease IDO acute infection
disease IDO blood
disease IDO process
disease IDO history
drug DRUGBANK Tretamine
disease IDO symptom
drug DRUGBANK Methionine
disease IDO object
drug DRUGBANK Cysteamine
disease MESH viral infection
drug DRUGBANK Ranitidine
disease MESH seroconversion
drug DRUGBANK Oxygen
drug DRUGBANK Trestolone
disease MESH Community Transmission
disease MESH memory deficits
disease MESH atrophy
disease MESH clinical relevance
disease MESH Long COVID
disease MESH delayed memory
disease MESH sequelae
drug DRUGBANK Etoperidone
disease IDO production
disease MESH Zoonotic Infections
drug DRUGBANK L-Phenylalanine
disease MESH symptom clusters
disease MESH Cognitive decline
disease MESH dementia
drug DRUGBANK Trihexyphenidyl
drug DRUGBANK Profenamine
disease MESH causality
disease MESH neurological disorders
disease MESH influenza
disease MESH common cold

Original Article

(Visited 2 times, 1 visits today)