Racial biases in clinical practice and medical education: a scoping review.

Racial biases in clinical practice and medical education: a scoping review.

Publication date: Oct 23, 2024

Health inequalities represent a major challenge in contemporary medicine, with some attributed to racial biases. Recently, in the United States, a call to combat discrimination in the field of health has resonated, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, in which minorities have been disproportionately affected. These calls echo recommendations from the Institute of Medicine dating back to 2001, urging the fight against inequalities in access to health care. In France, inequalities based on presumed origin persist, yet medical education on these issues is virtually nonexistent. We conducted a scoping review literature review in accordance with the JBI recommendations for scoping review writing and applied the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist to explore existing conceptual and educational data on racial biases in medicine. The inclusion criteria were interventional studies or evaluations of existing educational programs in medical training addressing the fight against racial biases in clinical settings published in French or English between 2003 and 2023. Six databases were systematically consulted. Out of 748 initial studies, 28 were included in our study. The median number of participants in the studies was low, interventions were diverse, and participants were generally well received, most of whom were self-selected. No study has evaluated the clinical impact of these interventions. The highlighted concepts included levels of racism, cultural competence, cultural humility, and critical race theory. The authors most frequently referred to institutionalized racism, demonstrating the systemic nature of these issues. At an individual level, implicit and unconscious biases were most often emphasized. It appears that the concept of “race” is a sociopolitical construct without supporting biological determinants. Humility is central to this field of study, as it encourages questioning of individual or collective medical practices. In France, the context, including the prohibition of ethnic statistics, may hinder the objectification of discrimination. Immersion and virtual patient scenarios emerged as potential solutions for evaluating the clinical impact of interventions. A more horizontal medical pedagogy seems better suited to teach these sensitive issues.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Dating COVID-19
France Education, Medical
Medicine France
Race Health inequities
Racism Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Implicit bias
Medical education
Racism
Racism
SARS-CoV-2

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH Health inequalities
disease MESH COVID-19
disease MESH access to health care
drug DRUGBANK Tropicamide
pathway REACTOME Reproduction
drug DRUGBANK Coenzyme M
drug DRUGBANK Diethylstilbestrol
drug DRUGBANK L-Citrulline
disease IDO history
disease MESH syphilis
disease MESH emergency
disease MESH syndrome
drug DRUGBANK Methionine
drug DRUGBANK Indoleacetic acid
disease IDO process
disease IDO country
drug DRUGBANK Methylergometrine
disease IDO homo sapiens
drug DRUGBANK Creatinine
disease MESH lifestyle
disease IDO quality
drug DRUGBANK Ethionamide
drug DRUGBANK Fenamole
drug DRUGBANK Aspartame
disease IDO production
drug DRUGBANK Cysteamine
drug DRUGBANK Trestolone
disease IDO intervention
disease MESH uncertainty
disease IDO susceptibility
drug DRUGBANK Trihexyphenidyl
drug DRUGBANK Profenamine
drug DRUGBANK Ilex paraguariensis leaf
drug DRUGBANK Gold
drug DRUGBANK Roxithromycin
disease MESH violence
drug DRUGBANK Spinosad

Original Article

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)