The relationship between strong-ties weak-ties rationality and COVID-19 public stigma: A cross-cultural study of Malaysia and Australia.

Publication date: Dec 01, 2024

We investigated the relationship between strong-ties versus weak-ties rationality and public stigma (PS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also explored the cultural group differences (Malaysians vs. Australians) in this relationship. An online survey was conducted in 2021 with a final sample of 830 eligible Malaysians and 394 eligible Australians. Participants completed the multidimensional strong-ties weak-ties rationality Scale (STWTRS) and an adapted public stigma (PS) scale towards COVID-19 patients. Through multiple regression analysis, we found that the strong-ties rationality, ST-Authoritarian rationality, was positively associated with PS-Blame in both countries. However, the variable Country moderated the relationship between ST-Communal and PS-Rejection, with a negative association found in Malaysia and a positive association in Australia. The findings confirmed the strong-ties weak-ties rationality framework, where ST rationality, especially ST-Authoritarian, could explain the cognitive mechanism behind negative attitudes towards those who pose threat towards the in-group survival. However, ST-Communal could buffer the rejection towards the COVID-19 patients in Malaysia due to its emphasis on social harmony. This study can inform future interventions aimed at mitigating stigma and promoting a more inclusive and supportive society in times of crisis.

Concepts Keywords
Australians Adult
Covid Australia
Harmony Authoritarianism
Malaysians COVID-19
Pandemic COVID‐19 pandemic
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Cross‐cultural study
Female
Humans
Malaysia
Male
Middle Aged
Public stigma
SARS-CoV-2
Social Stigma
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19
disease IDO country
disease MESH Social Stigma

Original Article

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)