Assessing chest radiographic quality and the influence of COVID-19 pathology: the Australian experience.

Publication date: Jan 02, 2025

Quality assurance (QA) in medical imaging ensures consistently high-quality images at acceptable radiation doses. However, the applicability of the chest X-ray (CXR) QA tool in images with pathology, particularly infectious diseases like COVID-19, has not been explored. This study examines the utility of the European Guidelines for image quality in QA of CXRs with varying severity and types of infectious disease. A convenient sampling methodology was employed to recruit 25 participants (qualified radiographers: n = 13 and 4th-year undergraduate radiography students: n = 12) to evaluate 70 CXR images using the European Guidelines for image quality in CXRs. The image dataset comprised of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases, which were randomly selected to reflect routine clinical practice variability. Participants independently rated image quality based on 10 criteria in the European guidelines on quality criteria for CXRs using a six-point Likert scale. Image quality ratings of normal and pathological CXR images were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman’s ranked order correlation was used to assess the association between quality criteria ratings. CXRs with no pathology or non-COVID pathologies exhibited statistically higher total QA scores compared to CXRs with COVID-19 and indeterminate COVID-19 (P 

Concepts Keywords
Australian COVID‐19
Infectious CXR
Pathology diagnostic imaging
Radiography image quality evaluation
Undergraduate medical imaging standards
radiographer performance
radiographic quality assurance
radiology education

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease IDO quality
disease MESH COVID-19
disease MESH infectious diseases
pathway REACTOME Infectious disease
disease IDO infectious disease

Original Article

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)