What made people (more) positive toward the COVID-19 vaccine? Exploring positive and negative deviance perspectives.

Publication date: Feb 04, 2025

Despite the associations of certain beliefs and worldviews (e. g., religiosity and belief in conspiracy theories) with non-vaccination behavior, some individuals who hold these views still choose vaccination, and vice versa. This study aims to explore why individuals choose to be vaccinated against COVID-19, despite holding opposing beliefs and worldviews, or refrain from doing so, when their beliefs align with vaccination. By examining both positive and negative deviant behavior, we seek to identify strategies and barriers for public health officials to develop interventions to improve vaccination uptake. We conducted semi-structured online interviews with 21 Dutch adults aged 28-75 years (13 positive deviants and 8 negative deviants) between January and July 2022. Interviewees were recruited on the basis of their response patterns in a survey that was part of a larger project on understanding vaccine hesitancy in the Netherlands. The interviews focused on how they formed their intention toward the COVID-19 vaccine and what could change it in the future. The data were analyzed via semi-inductive coding with Atlas. ti. 23. Positive deviants got vaccinated because they perceived COVID-19 as a threat, wanted to protect (vulnerable) others, or wanted to regain their freedom. Negative deviants did not get vaccinated because they did not perceive the vaccine as appropriate, the disease not as a threat, for religious reasons, or did not trust the authorities. The most important barriers and strategies that were identified that could improve vaccination uptake were unrelated to underlying beliefs and worldviews but related to characteristics of the vaccine such as effectiveness and (potential) side-effects. This study demonstrates the applicability of traditional health psychology models, such as the health belief model, in explaining deviant vaccination behavior. Additionally, leveraging prosocial motivations and imposing restrictions on non-vaccinated individuals have been effective strategies for promoting vaccination uptake, albeit restricted to pandemic contexts. As some individuals will remain resistant to vaccination efforts, tailored interventions for vaccine-hesitant individuals may yield greater success rather than attempting to persuade strict opponents of vaccination.

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Dutch Adult
July Aged
Models COVID-19
Psychology COVID-19
Vaccine COVID-19 Vaccines
COVID-19 Vaccines
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Positive deviants
Public health
Qualitative Research
Vaccination
Vaccination
Vaccination Hesitancy
Vaccine hesitancy

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19
disease MESH deviant behavior
drug DRUGBANK Spinosad
pathway REACTOME Reproduction
disease MESH infections
drug DRUGBANK Tropicamide
disease MESH malnutrition
disease MESH mumps
disease MESH measles
pathway KEGG Measles
disease MESH rubella
disease MESH pertussis
pathway KEGG Pertussis
disease MESH polio
disease MESH tetanus
disease MESH hepatitis
disease MESH meningococcal disease
disease MESH yellow fever
disease MESH rabies
disease MESH typhoid fever
disease MESH educational attainment
drug DRUGBANK Coenzyme M
disease MESH marital status
disease IDO infection
drug DRUGBANK Methionine
pathway REACTOME Immune System
drug DRUGBANK Polyethylene glycol
disease MESH heart failure
disease IDO process
drug DRUGBANK Trestolone
disease IDO history

Original Article

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)