Right-restricting measures implemented by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review protocol.

Publication date: Jul 17, 2025

The COVID-19 pandemic’s unprecedented nature has exposed significant vulnerabilities in most public health systems and highlighted the importance of coordinated responses across various levels of government. A global debate emerged on the types of health measures necessary to curb the rapid spread of contagious and/or lethal diseases. However, some of these measures involved restricting individual rights, raising significant ethical, legal and public health questions. The protocol of this systematic review aims to address a critical gap in the literature by analysing how Public Health Surveillance services worldwide implemented compulsory right-restricting measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and what impacts these measures had on public health outcomes and individual rights. This protocol focuses on studies about right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will be unrestrictive as to period (starting in 2019, when the outbreak was identified), language or publication status in a preliminary stage. It will include only peer-reviewed publications, discarding opinion articles, editorials, conference papers and non-peer-reviewed publications. Considering the PICo strategy, the research question of this systematic review can be formulated as follows: Problem-right-restricting measures enacted by Public Health Surveillance services; Interest-implementation modalities and impacts on individual rights and public health outcomes; Context-COVID-19 pandemic. This protocol will use the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane/CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Considering the various measures that may have been adopted, the following categories of analysis will be used: (i) Public Health Surveillance as a field, (ii) the various specific areas of Health Surveillance, (iii) law enforcement, (iv) right-restricting measures and consent, (v) interactions between right-restricting measures and routine Public Health Surveillance functions, (vi) differences between countries and (vii) Health Surveillance lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. These categories are not strictly mutually exclusive; however, each study will be assigned to the category most aligned with its primary focus. To ensure the validity and reliability of findings, each study will have its risk of bias assessed at both the study and outcome levels. Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this systematic review. The results will be presented in one or more articles to be submitted to scientific journals and may also be presented at scientific conferences and to public policy makers. This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 20 November 2024 (registration number CRD42024613039).

Open Access PDF

Concepts Keywords
Crd42024613039 Communicable Disease Control
Global COVID-19
Pandemic COVID-19
Science Humans
Pandemics
Public Health
PUBLIC HEALTH
Public Health Surveillance
SARS-CoV-2
Systematic Review

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19 pandemic
drug DRUGBANK Cysteamine
drug DRUGBANK Indoleacetic acid
drug DRUGBANK Trestolone
drug DRUGBANK Isoxaflutole
disease MESH privacy
drug DRUGBANK Spinosad
disease IDO process
disease IDO quality
disease IDO intervention
disease MESH infection
disease IDO country
pathway REACTOME Translation
disease MESH Emergencies
disease MESH Mental Disorders
disease MESH anxiety disorders
disease MESH Psychological Distress
disease IDO symptom
pathway KEGG Coronavirus disease
drug DRUGBANK Ferrous sulfate anhydrous
disease MESH sti
disease MESH Communicable Disease

Original Article

(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)