Publication date: Oct 01, 2025
IntroductionVirtual care and remote monitoring were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, early evaluations of effectiveness were often inconclusive due to low rates of enrolment and limited data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual care in managing individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine in Australia during this pandemic. MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of individuals admitted to a virtual hospital in Sydney who either tested positive for COVID-19 and required self-isolation, or tested negative but still needed to self-isolate, amidst the Delta wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcome measures included health service utilisation, in-hospital mortality, patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and cost savings resulting from avoided emergency department (ED) presentations. ResultsOut of 9571 individuals admitted, 8544 (89. 3%) had COVID-19. Clinical deterioration or acute illness occurred in 2477 (25. 9%) individuals, of whom 890 (9. 3%) were referred to ED for further assessment or investigation, and 614 (6. 4%) were admitted for inpatient treatment. Overall mortality was 0. 2%. Out of 1020 individuals who completed the PREM survey, 846 (82. 9%) rated the overall virtual care experience as ‘good’ or ‘very good’. Avoided ED presentations possibly resulted in cost savings estimated between AU$691,214 and AU$2,994,540. ConclusionVirtual care was successfully used to manage a large number of individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scalable pathways for triage, monitoring and clinical escalation via telehealth ensured patient safety and acceptability, and alleviated strain on the broader health system.
Semantics
| Type | Source | Name |
|---|---|---|
| disease | MESH | COVID-19 |
| disease | MESH | emergency |