Publication date: Sep 20, 2025
We analyzed the outcome of 2229 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) treated with ruxolitinib before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Two populations of MF were defined from the AIFA web monitoring registries: the pre-COVID-19 (1703, 76. 4%) and the post-COVID-19 (526, 23. 6%) cohorts. The two populations were balanced using the Inversity Probability of Treatment Weighting. The median age was 69 years and 73 years in the pre- and post- COVID-19 era, respectively. There were no differences in spleen diameters at baseline prior to ruxolitinib in the two groups, but a difference in median spleen volume was noted (961 cm3 in the pre-era and 788. 3 cm3 in the post-era). Overall, intermediate-2 IPSS risk were 67. 2% in the pre- and 72% in the post-era, whereas the high-risk category was 32. 7% and 27. 9%, respectively. More patients started on a reduced dose in the post-COVID-19 era (73. 5% versus 65% in the pre-era). After adjusting for the differences, an analysis of overall survival revealed no differences between the two groups (HR 0. 875, p > 0. 05). Patients who started ruxolitinib after COVID-19 had similar probability to stop treatment in the follow-up (HR 0. 956, p > 0. 05). The results indicate that COVID-19 did not affect the duration of treatment and the relative OS.

| Concepts | Keywords |
|---|---|
| Myelofibrosis | COVID-19 |
| Ruxolitinib | Myelofibrosis |
| Spleen | Overall survival |
| Ruxolitinib | |
| Starting dose |
Semantics
| Type | Source | Name |
|---|---|---|
| disease | MESH | myelofibrosis |
| drug | DRUGBANK | Ruxolitinib |
| disease | MESH | covid-19 pandemic |
| disease | MESH | Long Covid |