Lost and Found: Is Olfactory Recovery More Promising After COVID-19 Than Other Causes, Even 2 Years Later?

Publication date: May 11, 2026

Olfactory dysfunction is a hallmark feature of COVID-19, yet the potential for recovery with long-standing COVID-19-related smell loss (CRSL) remains uncertain, particularly when treatment is initiated years later. This study evaluated olfactory outcomes in patients with CRSL compared with non-COVID-19-related smell loss (non-CRSL), with emphasis on delayed treatment initiation. This retrospective cohort study included 104 patients evaluated at a tertiary clinic between January 2023 and February 2025, comprising 47 patients with CRSL and 57 with non-CRSL. All patients completed serial Sniffin’ Sticks testing (threshold, discrimination, and identification [TDI]) at ≥2 visits. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a ≥5. 5-point increase in TDI score. All patients received olfactory training combined with twice-daily steroid nasal irrigation. Subgroup analyses examined delayed treatment initiation (>2 years), treatment adherence, and COVID-19 vaccination status. Baseline TDI scores were higher in the CRSL group than in the non-CRSL group (19. 6 +/- 6. 3 vs. 16. 8 +/- 6. 8; p 2 years after onset. Prospective studies are needed to clarify causal relationships given known spontaneous recovery in post-viral olfactory dysfunction.

Concepts Keywords
Discrimination COVID‐19
February long‐term outcomes
Vaccination olfactory dysfunction
Viral post‐viral anosmia
smell loss

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19
disease MESH smell loss
disease MESH included

Original Article

(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *