Moral flexibility without mutual benefits: From change to disagreement.

Publication date: Jun 25, 2026

Resource-rational contractualism claims that moral flexibility leads to mutually beneficial agreements through renegotiation when new situations arise. We challenge this view using COVID-19 evidence, where moral change leads to persistent disagreement rather than consensus. We demonstrate that three psychological factors – social identity, confirmation bias, and emotional responses – systematically prevent convergence, revealing limitations in the resource-rational contractualism model.

Concepts Keywords
Covid COVID-19
Emotional Dissent and Disputes
Moral Emotions
Renegotiation Humans
Morals
Social Identification

Semantics

Type Source Name
disease MESH COVID-19

Original Article

(Visited 3 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *